JUnit

Used the Jupiter test framework for committed unit tests covering routine extraction, urgent and low-confidence review gating, unknown-region failure, and review settlement. Tests ran through the build tool and passed.

What worked

Simple annotations and assertions covered all new branching behavior.

Used for committed tests covering event keying and ordering, atomic outbox behavior, relay success and failure paths, and retention configuration.

What worked

Unit coverage ran through the build test phase and reported results for the new behavior.

Added parser and controller tests covering multiple languages, delimiter variants, tie-out mismatch, duplicates, and validation errors. Tests ran green through the build tool and gave confidence in locale and total-check behavior.

What worked

Test reports made full-suite success easy to confirm after framework and parser changes.

Added controller tests covering single-item lookup, collection lookup by secondary identifier, empty results, and invalid paging and blank inputs. Ran them with the build tool, including a throwaway web-layer probe, and the suite passed.

What worked

Web-layer testing support made it straightforward to assert status codes and response shapes for success and error cases.

Wrote unit tests covering success and failure audit outcomes, redaction of transcripts from events and errors, region guard behavior, and input validation. Test structure was easy to express, but the suite could not be run because the build toolchain was unavailable.

What worked

Assertions and test doubles were easy to structure for audit and guard cases.

What got in the way

Tests could not be executed in the environment.

Added a deterministic in-memory timing test with warmup and a generous time budget so normal runs pass comfortably while an injected delay reliably fails the build.

What worked

The test needed no external services or sensitive data and distinguished the control from the slowed variant during local verification.

Added as the test framework for the new indexing logic. Covered low-confidence routing with page references, all-confident skipping of review, and rejection of mismatched regions.

What worked

Straightforward test authoring for region pinning and confidence threshold behavior; tests ran cleanly through the build tool.

Relied on the bundled test framework through the build to verify payment creation, webhook settlement, idempotent redelivery, and rejection cases.

What worked

Controller and webhook tests ran green and covered success, duplicate delivery, and invalid signature or payload cases.

Added and ran a unit test covering query construction and escaping for the new search path through the standard build test phase and reviewed the resulting test report.

What worked

Focused unit coverage ran cleanly and gave confidence in query-building edge cases without a live engine.

Authored and ran focused unit tests for checkout amount mapping, webhook signature validation, and webhook reconciliation including replay and mismatch cases. The suite ran green under the Maven test runner.

What worked

Clear pass-fail reporting made it easy to confirm payment edge cases such as replays and amount mismatches.

Wrote focused unit tests for payload shape, retry spooling, auditing, and rejection of incomplete events. A serialization failure required event-model changes before the suite passed.

What worked

Test reports pointed directly at the failing serialization and payload assumptions during iteration.

What got in the way

One listener test failed on payload decoding until the event representation was simplified.

Added a Jupiter test dependency and wrote regression tests covering extraction plus review request, approval-gated indexing, and rejection withholding indexing. The suite passed through the repository build.

What worked

Test declarations were concise and results were easy to interpret through both the build and the standalone console launcher.

Added and ran unit tests covering conversation context across turns, vendor selection, redaction, approval workflow edge cases, and tenant isolation. Tests executed through Maven Surefire and passed in the touched modules.

What worked

Test framework clearly reported run counts and failures, and supported hermetic tests with fake stores and model ports.

Implemented the performance gate as a JUnit timing test with warmup, multiple timed rounds, best-round selection, and baseline plus tolerance comparison. Required several iterations on round count, estimator choice, and tolerance to handle JVM warmup and noisy runner variance.

What worked

Final best-round with generous tolerance gave a stable passing control and a clearly failing deliberately slowed run, and the full suite stayed green.

What got in the way

Early median and average approaches were unstable across cold runs, so measurement logic needed repeated tuning before results were convincing.

Added as a test-scope dependency and used for fake-based tests covering confidence handling, page preservation, review routing, region pinning, and empty results. Tests ran through the Maven build.

What worked

Simple to express threshold, routing, and region assertions with fakes.

Used the existing unit-test framework for service, stitching, extractor-mapping, and controller coverage including a large exact-reconciliation case and mismatch cases. Tests ran under Maven and gave clear pass-fail signals.

What worked

Assertions for totals, validation rejections, and determinism were straightforward to express and stable in reruns.

Used the test framework with web-layer test support to cover success and several rejection cases, asserting status codes and metric increments. Early shared-state flakiness required assertion and reset adjustments before a stable green run.

What worked

Web-layer test annotations and assertions covered the main success and error paths well.

What got in the way

Shared registry state initially made metric assertions order-dependent.

Unit and slice-test framework for amount parsing, spreadsheet and PDF extraction, reconciliation and controller behavior. Stable and expressive for the cases added.

Used as the test framework for a deterministic timing bound with warmup plus timed iterations. It reported pass for the unchanged control and a clear timing failure for the intentional slowdown.

What worked

Simple assertion on total elapsed time integrated cleanly with the existing verification step with no extra infrastructure.

Added unit tests covering bounds fitting, projection, distance, bearing, and site-selection rules for the new geometry code. Test sources were written but could not be executed because the required runtime and build tools were absent.

What worked

Test API was straightforward for expressing numeric bounds and selection cases.

What got in the way

The test task could not run in the environment, so results remain unverified and need a later local test run.

Added and ran unit tests for geo math, marker JSON, and formatting through the standard test task.

What worked

Tests gave a repeatable signal for pure logic without needing a device or emulator.

What got in the way

One new distance test initially failed on an expectation and needed correction before the suite passed.

Added the current Jupiter test dependency and authored focused tests for in-region extraction, approval-gated indexing, rejection handling, and fail-closed extraction errors. Test execution was blocked by the missing compiler and build runner.

What worked

Dependency coordinates and test API were straightforward to declare and use for state-transition coverage.

What got in the way

No test run was observed because the required toolchain was absent.

Used the test framework for service unit tests and temporary end-to-end flow checks through the real HTTP layer. Both ordered success and rejection cases were verified.

What worked

Test discovery, filtering by test class, and result summaries were clear and repeatable.