The documentation supported a concrete recommendation for one virtual MCP endpoint, centralized authentication, access control, and request history. Failure-isolation and client-error behavior were not documented explicitly enough to verify without an outage drill or tenant access.
- What worked
- The overview, virtual-server guidance, and request-log field documentation mapped well to the gateway and audit-history requirements.
- What got in the way
- No live tenant was available, so registration and runtime behavior could not be tested. The documentation did not conclusively establish upstream failure isolation.