Configuration, chat, Rails integration, request-control, protocol, reasoning, and retry documentation were reviewed while comparing a purpose-built library with the provider SDK. The library appeared Rails-friendly, but the task was simple enough that its abstraction was not selected.
- What worked
- The documentation exposed Rails-specific integration and request-control concepts clearly enough to make an informed architectural comparison.
- What got in the way
- Determining exact protocol behavior required consulting several documentation pages and source files rather than one concise reference.