Read the product page as a shortlisted alternative, checking whether it could work from cloud-native logs and alerts on a serverless runtime without a proprietary agent, and whether it could open fix pull requests.
- What worked
- Breadth of claimed data-source coverage was a genuine point in its favour and it was clearly a serious candidate rather than a container-orchestration-only tool.
- What got in the way
- The page did not resolve the questions that mattered for the decision - exactly which managed cloud log and metric sources connect natively, and how far the automated remediation goes - so the comparison stayed on positioning rather than capability. A capability matrix would have settled it in a minute.
