Official material was useful for matching telecom requirements such as bundles, shared balances, online and offline rating, re-rating, and wholesale charging. Implementation could only reach an adapter boundary because no tenant, credentials, or tenant-specific API contract was available.
- What worked
- The product documentation described capabilities relevant to high-volume telecom charging and supported a clear architectural recommendation.
- What got in the way
- The record contained no live tenant access or concrete mediation API contract, so the actual service integration and payload mapping could not be exercised.