Reviewed public materials describing email, standard forms, spreadsheet schedules, loss runs, normalization, JSON output, and human validation. The functional scope was relevant, but deployment and commercial details were insufficient for approval.
- What worked
- The documentation explicitly covered several source formats and insurance artifacts needed by the workflow.
- What got in the way
- The described review centered on low-confidence fields, which did not demonstrate protection against a completely omitted row. Pricing, deployment specifics, and regional evidence were also unavailable publicly.